秀色直播
Past events
2023听听触听听2021听听触听听2020听听触听听2019听听触听听2018听听触听听2017听听触听听2016听听触听听2015
2023
3 February 2023:聽Reading Stephen Tierney's聽The Federal Contract. A Constitutional Theory of Federalism
In his most recent book,听The Federal Contract. A Constitutional Theory of Federalism聽(Oxford University Press, 2022),听Stephen Tierney聽suggests a new outlook on federalism as a specific type of constitutionalism. He argues that the fundamental concepts of modern constitutionalism (such as notions of constituent power, sovereignty, and citizenship) must be rethought to consider the pluralism which characterizes federal states. The workshop's participants will interrogate Tierney's work on the basis of their own reflections on Canadian federalism and the particular challenges posed by pluralism in Canada. Does Tierney's theory adequately take into account the realities and challenges characteristic of federations composed of many demoi? These exchanges will take place in the presence of the author.
The event, which was co-organized by the Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire sur la diversit茅 et la d茅mocratie (CRIDAQ) and the Peter MacKell Chair in Federalism, took place on聽February 3rd, 2023 聽at聽秀色直播's Faculty Club.
1 February 2023: The "Secession Referendum" Debate in the UK: Legal and Constitutional Issues - A Legal Theory Workshop with Professor Stephen Tierney
The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom recently rejected the Scottish government's argument that it had a constitutional right to hold a referendum on secession, without Westminster's approval. The Court notably cited (very selective) excerpts of the Quebec Secession Reference in coming to its conclusion. How did the Court arrive at this decision and what was its constitutional rationale? And what, more broadly, does it tell us about the place of the referendum within devolved or federal systems?聽This Legal Theory Workshop with Professor Stephen Tierney, co-organized by Professors Johanne Poirier and Joshua Nichols, took place on聽February 1st, 2023聽in the聽Caren and Jordan H. Waxman Common Room聽of 秀色直播's Faculty of Law.
2021
8 November 2021: Federalism and the Charter: Rethinking the Connections
On 8 November 2021, as part of the conference The Charter at Forty, Professors Johanne Poirier and Colleen Sheppard gave an online presentation titled 鈥淔ederalism and the Charter: Rethinking the Connections鈥�.
Presentation outline
Federalism and the Canadian Charter are often conceived as being in tension with one another. The Charter is seen as a pan-national document affirming individual (and some collective) rights and imposing uniform values and norms across the country in ways that risk undermining provincial diversity and the multinational character of Canadian federation. Indeed, it is possible to point to cases affirming reproductive rights and same sex equality rights as examples of the Supreme Court intervening to affirm Charter rights at odds with provincial choices. However, there is another strand of constitutional jurisprudence that complicates this traditional narrative. Federalism allows for local innovations and experimentation that have proven critically important for advancing rights and freedoms. Moreover, building on process-based conceptions of constitutionalism, the meaning of rights has also been informed by attentiveness to participation in local democracy, minority empowerment, collective solidarity and self-governance. Examples include linguistic rights, the rights of Indigenous peoples and provincially enacted rights rooted in citizen mobilization. In some contexts, therefore, the affirmation of constitutional rights reinforces a decentralized vision of governance. Rethinking the traditional dichotomy between conceptions of federalism and constitutional rights, therefore, makes possible a more nuanced and complex understanding of the jurisdictional dimensions of justice.
8 June 2021: Webinar on the Belgian federation - Primaut茅 au f茅d茅ral? Voorrang voor het federale niveau?
On Tuesday 8 June 2021,听the Re-Bel Initiative (Re-Thinking Belgian Institutions in a European Context) held聽a webinar at which Professor Johanne Poirier spoke. The event was in French and in Dutch.
La 芦聽primaut茅 f茅d茅rale聽禄 est une r猫gle de conflit, pr茅sente dans la plupart des r茅gimes f茅d茅raux. V茅ritable accroc 脿 l'茅quilibre f茅d茅ral, elle doit 锚tre mobilis茅e de mani猫re tr猫s pond茅r茅e.聽- Johanne Poirier
Event description
Belgium鈥檚 current federal structure aims to facilitate policy making by allocating exclusive competences to the federal government and parliament on the one hand and to the governments and parliaments of Belgium鈥檚 regions and communities on the other. Both levels are sovereign in their respective domains. There is no hierarchy that confers primacy to federal legislation over regional and community legislation, in contrast, for example, with Germany鈥檚 federal system, where Bundesrecht bricht Landesrecht is one of the guiding principles.
However, the measures necessitated by the pandemic, the need to honour EU-level commitments on the climate and the controversies over Brussels鈥� air traffic noise norms and congestion charges led many to question the wisdom of dispensing with such a federal primacy principle. To avoid confusion, delays and blockages, would it make sense to allow the federal level to coordinate regional action, issue binding policy guidelines or even overrule regional and community legislation? In other words, should Belgium establish some form of hierarchy between the federal level and the regional level, possibly under specific conditions, such as emergency situations or the risk of failing to comply with European obligations? Or would this amount to depriving the regions and communities of some of their autonomy without any significant gain in the efficiency of policy making?
Moderation: B茅atrice DELVAUX (Le Soir) & Karel VERHOEVEN (De Standaard)
Welcoming: Philippe VAN PARIJS (Re-Bel & UCLouvain)
Introduction: Gwendolyn RUTTEN (Open VLD)
Challenges: Johanne POIRIER (秀色直播, Montreal), Patricia POPELIER (UAntwerpen), Marc UYTTENDAELE (ULB)
General discussion
Concluding comments: Paul DE GRAUWE (Re-Bel & LSE)
22 February 2021: Webinar - Boundary or Pandemic Control? Understanding Subnational Border Restrictions to Control COVID19 in Federal Systems
On 22 February 2021,听Professor Johanne Poirier participated in a webinar hosted by the Australian Centre for Federalism and the Centre for International and Public Law.聽
Official Event Description
This webinar will explore the use (or, non-use) of subnational border restrictions and closures to control the spread of COVID19 in federal systems. Expert panelists from Australia, Canada, the USA, Italy, Argentina, and Brazil will discuss the legal considerations and potential political motives of using subnational borders as a mechanism of pandemic control. The event will be chaired and moderated by Dr Tracy Beck Fenwick, Director of the Australian Centre for Federalism, School of Politics & International Relations, ANU.
Expert Panel Speakers
- Laureate Professor Cheryl Saunders AO, University of Melbourne Law School, Australia.
- Professor Johanne Poirier, Peter MacKell Chair in Federalism, 秀色直播 Faculty of Law, Canada.
- Professor Daniel Beland, James 秀色直播 Professor, Director of 秀色直播 Institute for the Study of Canada.
- Professor John Kincaid, Professor of Government and Public Service, Lafayette College, Pennsylvania, USA.
- Associate Professor Andre Borges, Institute of Political Science, University of Bras铆lia, Brazil.
- Professor Lucas Gonzalez, CONICET, University of San Martin, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
- Dr Elisabeth Alber, Institute for Comparative Federalism, EURAC, Bolzano, Italy.
12 January 2021: Presentation - Intergovernmental Relations in Federal Systems
Professor Johanne Poirier presented聽at the fourth event of the Hanns Seidel Foundation's and 50 Shades of Federalism's collaboratively organized online seminar "Turn on Federalism". The talk, titled "Intergovernmental Relations in Federal Systems", was聽moderated by Anja Richter. The event was held in English, and simultaneous translation in Myanmar was provided.
Regardless of institutional design, all federal systems imply substantial degrees of interaction between federal partners. "Intergovernmental relations" (IGR) refer to the many modalities through which this interaction takes place. They are the essential "oil in the machinery" of every federal system, and as such are ubiquitous. IGR take many shapes and forms. They fluctuate with time and according to policy areas.
In this sense, they are idiosyncratic. This presentation explores the actors in the IGR game as well as the rich catalogue of legislative 鈥� and mostly executive-techniques on which these actors rely to structure their relations. IGR waltz between institutionalization and informality, often in an opaque fashion which tends to reinforce the executive branch of each federal partner. How do IGR help systems work better? How have IGR in different federations evolved to deal with contemporary challenges, from growing government-coordination needs to handling emergency situations?
2020
21 May 2020: Webinar on federalism and COVID-19
On May 21, 2020, the Peter MacKell Chair in Federalism and the Groupe de recherche sur les soci茅t茅s plurinationales organized a webinar on federalism and COVID-19. With researchers coming from nine federations and quasi-federation (Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Germany, Italy, South Africa, Switzerland and the United States), this online event outlined, through concise presentations, various federations' responses to the pandemic. It enabled us to draw of parallels between countries, while highlighting approaches specific to each.
The discussion was crisp, informative and stimulating, and gave researchers the opportunity to build connections around the world. A second discussion is planned in a few weeks to deepen the ideas exchanged during the first 鈥� and provide well-needed updates.
We were fortunate to hear presentations from the following researchers on their country's situation:
- Italy: Francesco Palermo (EURAC Institute for Comparative Federalism, Bolzano/Bozen)
- Australia: Nicholas Aroney (University of Queensland)
- Germany: Sabine Kropp (Free University of Berlin)
- South Africa: Nico Steytler (University of the Western Cape)
- Belgium: Patricia Popelier (University of Antwerp)
- Brazil: Augustina Giraudy (School of International Service, Washington DC)
- Canada: Mireille Paquet (Concordia University)
- Switzerland: Eva Maria Belser (Institute of Federalism, Fribourg)
- USA: Jennifer Selin (University of Missouri)
2019
22 February 2019: The Challenges of Coexistence: Language Policy in Canada
Much has been written recently about language policy in Canada, in light of political developments in provinces like New Brunswick and Ontario, the 50th Anniversary of the Official Languages Act and the announced recognition of Indigenous languages in Canada. The objective of this Symposium is to discuss language policy in Canada, with a particular emphasis on language minorities. The event focuses on Canada鈥檚 two official languages and their fate at the federal and provincial levels while also bringing to the fore issues related to other languages present in Canada, including Indigenous languages.
2018
6 November 2018: Les enjeux constitutionnels entourant la succession royale au Canada
The MacKell Chair is co-organising a Constitutional Moment with聽Patrick Taillon,听Julien Fournier,听Catherine Mathieu听补苍诲听Mark D. Walters.
28 March 2018: Metaphors and Constitutional Amendments in Canada and the UK
The MacKell Chair is co-organising a Constitutional Moment with聽Paul Daly, Professor of Law at the University of Cambridge.
2017
22 November 2017: Constitution of Canada, 2017: Reinventing the fundamental law of a plurinational State
We held a Constitutional Moment talk with Professor Johanne Poirier (秀色直播 U) and Professor Daniel Turp (UdeM), and their students.
8-9 June 2017: Fiscal Federalism in Plurinational Societies: Equality and Autonomy
The MacKell Chair participated to the conference at Universit茅 du Qu茅bec 脿 Montr茅al.
19 May 2017: 2e Conf茅rence Beetz-Laskin en droit constitutionnel canadien
The MacKell Chair was at the Beetz-Laskin conference to participate on a panel examining Federalism, Cooperation and Amendment, at Universit茅 de Montr茅al's Faculty of Law.
April 2017: Concluding the聽Questions approfondies de droit constitutionnel course in Ottawa
Taking place in 2017, the year marking the 150th anniversary of the creation of the Canadian federation, the Questions approfondies de droit constitutionnel course was taught in collaboration by Professors Johanne Poirier (U. 秀色直播) and Daniel Turp (U. de Montr茅al). The course brought together 26 students from both law faculties.
The primary objective of the course was to 鈥渕odernize鈥� the Constitution of Canada: regroup its scattered sections (the multiple 鈥渃onstitutional laws鈥� and their annexes) and propose potential modifications, notably to codify certain conventions, or even entrench certain principles. The main idea was to propose a legible, living and contemporary constitutional instrument. After the students drafted together the text of a new (and ficticious) Canadian Constitution, the class ended with a simulation of a Constituent Assembly in Ottawa.
March 27, 2017: Constitutional Moment with Cheryl Saunders
The Regroupement Droit, changements et gouvernance welcomed a talk on "" with Cheryl Saunders, Professor Emeritus, University of Melbourne. This event took place in Prof. Poirier's class.
March 23 and 24, 2017: Canadian Federalism and its Future/Le f茅d茅ralisme canadien et son avenir
The "Canadian Federalism and its Future: Actors and Institutions" colloquium was organized in the broader context of the 150th anniversary of the Canadian confederation by the聽Groupe de recherche sur les soci茅t茅s plurinationales聽(GRSP) in partnership with 秀色直播's Peter MacKell Research Chair on Federalism and the 秀色直播 and Laval University faculties of law. Taking place over two days, the conference started at 秀色直播 in Montreal, continued on a train to Quebec City, and ended at the Mus茅e de la civilisation in Old Quebec City. See in Focus online (秀色直播 Law's e-monthly).
Film: The Ways of Reconciliation
A portion of the colloquium took place at 秀色直播; the other, at the Mus茅e de la civilisation in Quebec City.
Between Montreal and Quebec City, a three-hour "Moving Seminar: The Ways of Reconciliation" took place aboard a train wagon specially chartered for the occasion. Participants (some coming from as far as Australia, Germany and Switzerland) experienced a section of the railway that was so crucial both to the unification of Canada, and to the Canadian colonial undertaking that deprived so many Indigenous peoples of their lands and autonomy.
This unusual setting allowed us to reflect in a very concrete manner on the impact and meaning of federalism for Indigenous Peoples. Simply recognizing the three First Nations territories that the train crossed along this 250-km journey was a significant pedagogical and emotional moment for all travellers.
The symposium brought together Mr. Ghislain Picard, Chief of the Assembly of First Nations of Quebec and Labrador, Professor Janique Dubois, specialist (among others) in governance in Metis communities, and Mr. Ry Moran, director of the National Centre on Truth and Reconciliation (University of Manitoba), and was facilitated by Mr. Daniel Sal茅e, professor of Political Science at Concordia University.
Watch the 48-minute film, A Moving Seminar: The Ways of Reconciliation
March 22, 2017: Baxter Competition Symposium
The three finalists of the Baxter Family Competition on Federalism presented their papers at 秀色直播's Faculty Club in front of many of the jury members who have selected them.
150e anniversaire du Canada: Le moment de faire le point
Johanne Poirier | 20 mars 2017 | Le Devoir
芦聽L'ann茅e 2017 marque les 150聽ans de la f茅d茅ration canadienne. L鈥檃nniversaire ne m茅rite pas n茅cessairement une c茅l茅bration. Mais c鈥檈st le moment de faire le point et de lever les tabous.聽Imaginez des jeunes qui se disent que la coexistence pacifique et les diff茅rents modes de r茅conciliation doivent, aussi, passer par une discussion sur nos valeurs partag茅es et sur les modalit茅s d鈥檕rganisation et de partage du pouvoir. Imaginez que le mot 芦聽Constitution聽禄 ne soit plus un 芦聽vilain mot聽禄鈥� ou un somnif猫re鈥β犅�
February 24, 2017: Constitutional Moment with Naomi Metallic
The Regroupement Droit, changements et gouvernance welcomes a talk on 芦聽Revitalisation des langues autochtones et r茅conciliation聽: urgence d鈥檃gir聽禄 with Naomi Metallic, Assistant Professor and聽Chancellor's Chair in Aboriginal Law and Policy at the Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie.
2016
November 25, 2016: Vers un esprit sain en partage des comp茅tences? Normativity in Health and Criminal Jurisdictions in Canada
A Constitutional Moment talk with Professor Alana Klein, Faculty of Law, 秀色直播. Kindly note this talk takes place at Universit茅 de Montr茅al.
This year, the Matin茅es constitutionnelles / Constitutional Moments series, which is co-organised by 秀色直播 Law and the Centre de droit public de l鈥橴niversit茅 de Montr茅al (RDCG), will be devoted alternatingly to federalism and linguistic rights.
11h30, Salon Fran莽ois-Chevrette, Universit茅 de Montr茅al.
October 28-29, 2016, Ottawa - Constitutional Politics in Multinational States
A Groupe de recherche sur les soci茅t茅s plurinationales conference, organized by Andr茅 Lecours (Ottawa U.), Johanne Poirier (秀色直播 U.) and Guy Laforest (Laval U.)
October 26, 2016, 秀色直播: Gestion de l鈥檌mmigration et politiques d鈥檌nt茅gration dans des Etats f茅d茅raux聽: Belgique et Canada
A MacKell Chair in Federalism Conference with Catherine Xhardez, PhD Candidate at Sciences Po Paris. Discussant: Daniel Weinstock.
12:30-14:00, NCDH 316
November 16, 2016, 秀色直播: The Impact of BREXIT on Linguistic Issues in the EU
A Constitutional Moment talk with St茅phanie Chouinard, postdoctoral researcher and lecturer, Facult茅 de droit, Universit茅 de Montr茅al.
Time, place: 12:30-14:00, NCDH 201.
April 6, 2016
PAPILLON, Martin, 芦聽Le f茅d茅ralisme est-il un mod猫le viable de gouvernance autochtone?聽禄, Faculty of Law, 秀色直播.
March 31, 2016
LEVRAT, Nicolas, 芦聽Gouvernance europ茅enne et migration聽禄, Faculty of Law, 秀色直播, in collaboration with the Oppenheimer Chair.
March 16, 2016
LEVRAT, Nicolas, 鈥淭he Impact of Globalisation on Multinational Federations鈥�, Les Matin茅es constitutionnelles, Faculty of Law, 秀色直播, in collaboration with Centre de recherche en droit public () at Universit茅 de Montr茅al.
2015
December 8, 2015
TOMKIN, Adam (Edinburgh University), 鈥淏ritain鈥檚 Territorial Constitution: Can The Union Hold?鈥�.
November 23, 2015
WELDON, Laurel (Purdue University), 鈥淕endered Federal Systems:鈥↖nformal Institutions, Intersectionality and Change鈥�, (co-organized with the Annie MacDonald Langstaff Workshop), Faculty of Law, 秀色直播.
October 26-27, 2015
VINTRO, Joan (Facult茅 de droit, Universit茅 de Barcelone), 芦聽Les bases juridiques et politiques de l鈥檃ccession d鈥檜ne Catalogne ind茅pendante 脿 l鈥橴nion europ茅enne聽禄.
August 11, 2015
World Federalist Movement - Canada, in collaboration with the 秀色直播 Center for Human Rights and Legal Pluralism: 鈥淔rom Global to Local聽: the Importance of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples to Reconciliation in Canada", by Senator Murray Sinclair, the former Chair of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.